Capital & Compute

Start Here: A Map of Capital & Compute

New here? The six topics this site covers, the free tools and datasets behind them, and the best first read on each one, in one page.

Capital & Compute covers one question from many angles: what does artificial intelligence actually cost, and who pays it. That means token prices, coding-agent bills, benchmark credibility, memory and GPU markets, data-center capital, and the economics underneath all of it. There are 194 published analyses and 33 free tools.

This page is the map. If you would rather just browse, the full archive is ordered newest first.

Three ways in

  1. You have a decision to make. Go straight to a tool. The calculators and trackers below answer specific questions with numbers rather than prose.
  2. You want to understand a subject. Pick one of the six topics and read its starting analysis, then follow the links from there.
  3. You are a machine. The manifest at /llms.txt describes the site and every dataset. Structured data ships as JSON at the endpoints listed at the foot of this page.

The six topics

Every post belongs to one of these, and each topic hub carries its own full archive.

The tools

All free, no signup, no paywall. Calculators run in the browser; trackers are rebuilt from source-verified data rather than fetched live, so a number on the page is a number someone checked. See the tools hub for the full set.

How to judge this site

Read the parts that let you check our work rather than take it on faith:

Most of what we publish has a shelf life. Posts carry the date they were last updated, and the data pages carry their own refresh dates. If you find a figure that has moved, send a correction and it gets fixed and re-dated.

What the numbers here will and will not do

The trackers follow one rule that is worth knowing before you read them: prices from different markets are never averaged together. A memory chip has a spot price, a contract price, a retail kit price and a server street price, and those four can move in opposite directions in the same week. Blending them produces a single tidy figure that is wrong in every direction at once, so each channel is kept in its own column with its own source and its own date.

The same discipline applies to what is missing. Where a source has not published a value, the cell stays blank rather than being filled with an estimate, and where a figure rests on a single listing it is flagged as thin rather than presented as a market. Forecasts are labelled as forecasts and attributed to whoever made them. The cost of this is that the pages are less quotable than a single headline number; the benefit is that when a figure here disagrees with one you read elsewhere, you can see exactly which market each of you is describing.

Getting your product listed

The directories take submissions: AI tools, models, inference providers, benchmarks, and agent skills. Every number recorded has to be verifiable against a page the vendor publishes, and enhanced and featured listings are available as paid options. How to submit or correct an entry.

Machine-readable access

Crawlers and answer engines are welcome. Nothing here is gated, and the datasets are published as JSON so you can cite the data rather than scrape the page.

If you cite us, link the canonical URL (all of them use a trailing slash) and name the date you read it. Our numbers move.