Capital & Compute

AI Model Release Tracker

Tracker· Updated October 2026

The latest and upcoming AI models in 2026, with release dates, per-token pricing, and a link to every provider's own page. Released models are verified against official pricing; upcoming ones appear only when a primary source confirms them. To turn a sticker rate into what a task actually costs, use the cost-per-task calculator or put two models head to head in the model comparison, and for monthly plan prices see the AI coding plan comparison.

What new AI models launched in 2026?

The most recent arrivals are Meta's Muse Wonder, released October 12 as an API preview at $4/$20 per Mtok, the same rate card as Claude Opus 5.5, and Muse Wonder Full, which is sold only inside Meta's Muse Code subscriptions. Before them came Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5, released October 7 at $0.10/$0.50 per Mtok for prompts up to 100,000 tokens, the same rate card as GPT-6 Luna, a day after Mistral opened a half-price public preview of Large 4 at $0.68/$2.09, with open weights promised by the end of the month. Reflection AI announced the 501B-parameter Beam on October 5 but has not opened it to the public. Before them, OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Sol arrived at DevDay on September 29 and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, and September 22 brought OpenAI's GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, both halving the GPT-5.6 tiers they replace, and Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5, the first Anthropic flagship to launch cheaper than its predecessor. The table below lists every tracked model with its current per-token rate, each read from the provider's own pricing page and dated.

For this month specifically, see the full roundup of new AI models released in October 2026. This page tracks what each model costs now; for the dated chronology of what shipped when, and the price each model launched at, see AI model releases by month.

Released and available

Models you can call today, newest first. Rates are USD per million tokens (Mtok), standard non-batch pricing, each verified against the provider's official page.

Provider · ModelStatusReleased / expectedInput / output (per Mtok)Source
Meta
Muse Wonder
PreviewOct 2026$4 / $20Source ↗
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
ReleasedOct 2026Not yet pricedSource ↗
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5
ReleasedOct 2026$0.1 / $0.5Source ↗
Mistral
Mistral Large 4
PreviewOct 2026$0.68 / $2.09Source ↗
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
PreviewSep 2026$2 / $10Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol
ReleasedSep 2026$2 / $10Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
ReleasedSep 2026$2 / $10Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
ReleasedSep 2026$4 / $20Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
ReleasedSep 2026$2 / $10Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
ReleasedSep 2026$0.1 / $0.5Source ↗
xAI
Grok 4.7
ReleasedSep 2026$2 / $6Source ↗
Unbiased
Pareto 26.9
ReleasedSep 2026$2.5 / $7.5Source ↗
DeepSeekChina
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ReleasedSep 2026$0.3 / $1.2Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra
ReleasedSep 2026$10 / $50Source ↗
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
ReleasedSep 2026$0.75 / $3.75Source ↗
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
ReleasedSep 2026$1.25 / $4.25Source ↗
AlibabaChina
Qwen3.8-Max-0902
ReleasedSep 2026$2 / $6Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
ReleasedSep 2026$10 / $50Source ↗
ZhipuChina
GLM-5.3-Flash
ReleasedAug 2026$0.15 / $0.5Source ↗
AlibabaChina
Qwen3.8-27B
ReleasedAug 2026Not yet pricedSource ↗
Google
Gemini 3.7 Flash
ReleasedAug 2026$0.75 / $3.75Source ↗
xAI
Grok 4.6
ReleasedAug 2026$2 / $6Source ↗
AlibabaChina
Qwen3.8-Max
ReleasedAug 2026$2 / $6Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
ReleasedJul 2026$5 / $25Source ↗
MoonshotChina
Kimi K3
ReleasedJul 2026$3 / $15Source ↗
Thinking Machines
Inkling
ReleasedJul 2026$1.87 / $4.68Source ↗
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
ReleasedJul 2026Not yet pricedSource ↗
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol
ReleasedJul 2026$4 / $20Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra
ReleasedJul 2026$2 / $12Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
ReleasedJul 2026$0.2 / $1.2Source ↗
xAI
Grok 4.5
ReleasedJul 2026$2 / $6Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5
ReleasedJun 2026$2 / $10Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5
ReleasedJun 2026$10 / $50Source ↗
Cohere
North Mini Code
ReleasedJun 2026Not yet pricedSource ↗
DeepSeekChina
DeepSeek V4 Pro
ReleasedApr 2026$1.32 / $3.96Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8
Released–$5 / $25Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Released–$3 / $15Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Released–$1 / $5Source ↗
OpenAI
GPT-5.5
Released–$5 / $30Source ↗
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Released–$2 / $12Source ↗
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released–$1.5 / $9Source ↗
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Released–$0.5 / $3Source ↗
AlibabaChina
Qwen3.7 Max
Released–$2.5 / $7.5Source ↗
MoonshotChina
Kimi K2.7 Code
Released–$0.95 / $4Source ↗
ZhipuChina
GLM-5.2
Released–$1.4 / $4.4Source ↗
Thinking Machines
Inkling-Small
Preview–Not yet pricedSource ↗
Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Released–$0.75 / $3.75Source ↗
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2
Released–$1.25 / $4.25Source ↗
Meta
Muse Glimmer
Released–Not yet pricedSource ↗
ZhipuChina
GLM-5.3
Released–Not yet pricedSource ↗

The rate card is only the starting point. Model any of these in the cost-per-task calculator to see what a real coding task costs, and why the cheapest per-token model is often not the cheapest to finish the job.

Upcoming AI models

Short list, and that is the finding rather than an omission. The labs emptied their pipelines in September, and the one entry below, Reflection AI's Beam, was announced on October 5 with only a waitlist behind it. What is listed is what a provider has actually confirmed and not yet shipped. No release date appears unless a provider has stated one, and no price is recorded for an unreleased model however widely a figure is repeated.

Provider · ModelStatusReleased / expectedSource
Reflection AI
Beam
AnnouncedOctober 2026Source ↗

What was on this list, and what it turned out to be

The useful test of a release tracker is not how many rumors it carries, it is what those rumors were worth once the model shipped. Every unreleased entry this tracker carried before October 2026 has now graduated, and each one is checked against the shipped result below.

Carried here asListedWhat actually shipped
Gemini 4Announced by Google as a pre-training run, with no window, price or benchmarkJuly 21 to September 30, 2026Released as Gemini 4 Argon on September 30 to cyber defenders in the Fairwind Program first, at an introductory $2 input and $10 output per Mtok that Google says rises to $4 and $20, with no end date stated. what Gemini 4 Argon actually shipped at.
GPT-6Rumored, on an independent tracker alone, with no OpenAI statementJune 20 to September 3, 2026Released as GPT-6 Astra on September 3 at $10 input and $50 output per Mtok, with a 2x surcharge above 272,000 tokens, then GPT-6 Sol and Luna on September 22 at half the GPT-5.6 rates, and GPT-6.1 Sol at DevDay on September 29 with the cache read halved again. what GPT-6 Astra actually shipped at.
Claude Fable 5.1Rumored, on community reports of an unannounced model stringAugust 2026 to September 1, 2026Released September 1 holding Fable 5 at $10 and $50 per Mtok, cutting only the cache read, from $1.00 to $0.25. Claude Opus 5.5 undercut that rate three weeks later at $0.20. what Fable 5.1 actually shipped at.
GPT-5.6 familyAnnounced by OpenAI, listed here as expected with no dateJune 26 to July 9, 2026Sol, Terra and Luna went generally available July 9. how the preview compared.

The pattern across all four: the date was the part the rumors got wrong, and the price was the part they had no business asserting at all. GPT-6 sat here as a rumor for 75 days on a single independent tracker before OpenAI said anything, and Fable 5.1 arrived at exactly the headline rate it replaced, moving only the cache read.

Which lab is due next

With the announced list this thin, the only honest forward signal is arithmetic on the dated record. Below is how long each lab has gone without a flagship release, measured against the 12 providers that have shipped one since Jun 9. It is elapsed time, not a prediction, and none of it implies a date.

Days since each lab's last flagship modelDays elapsed since each provider's most recent flagship release, as of October 13, 2026. Moonshot 89 days since Kimi K3 on Jul 16; Zhipu 48 days since GLM-5.3-Flash on Aug 26; Alibaba 48 days since Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on Aug 26; IFM 40 days since K2 Horizon 375B-A23B on Sep 3; DeepSeek 33 days since DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on Sep 10; Unbiased 26 days since Pareto 26.9 on Sep 17; xAI 22 days since Grok 4.7 on Sep 21; Anthropic 15 days since Claude Sonnet 5.5 on Sep 28; OpenAI 14 days since GPT-6.1 Sol on Sep 29; Google 13 days since Gemini 4 Argon on Sep 30; Mistral 7 days since Mistral Large 4 on Oct 6; Meta 1 days since Muse Wonder on Oct 12.0 d20 d40 d60 d80 d100 dMoonshot: Kimi K3, Jul 1689 dZhipu: GLM-5.3-Flash, Aug 2648 dAlibaba: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, Aug 2648 dIFM: K2 Horizon 375B-A23B, Sep 340 dDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Sep 1033 dUnbiased: Pareto 26.9, Sep 1726 dxAI: Grok 4.7, Sep 2122 dAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5, Sep 2815 dOpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol, Sep 2914 dGoogle: Gemini 4 Argon, Sep 3013 dMistral: Mistral Large 4, Oct 67 dMeta: Muse Wonder, Oct 121 d
Days since each lab's last flagship model
ItemValue
Moonshot: Kimi K3, Jul 1689 d
Zhipu: GLM-5.3-Flash, Aug 2648 d
Alibaba: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, Aug 2648 d
IFM: K2 Horizon 375B-A23B, Sep 340 d
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Sep 1033 d
Unbiased: Pareto 26.9, Sep 1726 d
xAI: Grok 4.7, Sep 2122 d
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5, Sep 2815 d
OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol, Sep 2914 d
Google: Gemini 4 Argon, Sep 3013 d
Mistral: Mistral Large 4, Oct 67 d
Meta: Muse Wonder, Oct 121 d
Days since each lab's last flagship release, as of October 13, 2026. Derived from this site's own release record: 126 days of coverage beginning Jun 9, flagship releases only. A short window and a small per-lab sample, so this measures elapsed time against an observed record and predicts nothing.Source: Capital & Compute release record

7 of the 12 labs shipped a flagship within the last 30 days, which is why the announced list is this short rather than neglected. The outlier is Moonshot, 89 days out from Kimi K3, and it is the only lab here with a single flagship in the window, so there is no interval to compare that against.

Only one lab has shipped enough flagships in this window to state an interval at all. Anthropic has 6 in the record, spaced 21, 24, 39, 21, 6 days apart, a median of 21. OpenAI has 4 in the record, spaced 56, 19, 7 days apart, a median of 19. Every other lab has one or two gaps, and a median of two numbers is just their average, so no interval is claimed for them. The longest single gap anywhere in the record is 59 days. Read the full chronology, with the price each model launched at, on AI model releases by month.

Released in the last 30 days

29 models shipped in the 30 days to October 13, 2026, newest first. Every date is taken from the provider's own announcement.

Retired or suspended

Models withdrawn, suspended, or superseded, including any pulled by a regulator. Kept for reference with the source that reported the change.

Provider · ModelStatusReleased / expectedInput / output (per Mtok)Source
DeepSeekChina
DeepSeek V4 Flash
RetiredJul 2026$0.44 / $1.32Source ↗
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Retired–$15 / $75Source ↗

How this tracker stays honest

Every released model's per-token rate is read off the provider's own API pricing page, stored with that exact source URL, and dated to the day it was checked. A model reaches the upcoming table only when the provider has officially announced it or credible reporting has surfaced it, and that entry carries the reporting source. No release date is published unless a primary source states it, and no rumor appears without a citation. When a number cannot be confirmed against an official page, it is left off rather than guessed.

Released, preview, announced, rumored: what the labels mean

  • Released: generally available, callable today, with a verified rate card.
  • Preview: available to use but still rolling out or limited, so the rate may move.
  • Announced: the provider has officially confirmed the model and, usually, a window, but it is not yet callable.
  • Rumored: surfaced by credible reporting rather than the provider, with no confirmed date. Treated as a lead, attributed to its source, never as fact.

The sticker rate is not the bill

A low per-token price does not make a model cheap to run. What a coding task costs is set by how many tokens the agent burns reading context, reasoning, and generating output, and that swings by more than an order of magnitude between models and runs. A 2026 Microsoft Research preprint found the cheaper-listed model finished the same work at a higher cost in roughly a third of matchups, the price reversal phenomenon. The honest unit is cost to finish a representative slice of your own tasks: the cost-per-task calculator models it for every row in this tracker, and the Claude Code cost breakdown walks the math end to end.

Frequently asked questions

What new AI models launched in 2026?

As of October 2026, the models tracked here include Mistral's Large 4 (a 1.05-trillion-parameter model in public preview since October 6 at a launch-sale $0.68/$2.09 per Mtok, half its standard $1.36/$4.18, with open weights promised by the end of October), OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra (released September 3 at $10/$50 per Mtok, with a 2x surcharge on prompts over 272,000 tokens), GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna (released September 22 at $2/$10 and $0.10/$0.50, halving the GPT-5.6 tiers they replace) and GPT-6.1 Sol (released September 29 at DevDay at the same $2/$10 with cached input halved to $0.10); Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1 (released September 1 alongside the invitation-only Mythos 5.1, holding Fable 5's $10/$50 per Mtok and cutting only the cache read, from $1.00 to $0.25), Claude Opus 5.5 (released September 22 at $4/$20 per Mtok, 20% under the Opus 5 it replaces, with the cache read cut 60% to $0.20), Claude Sonnet 5.5 (released September 28 at Sonnet 5's unchanged $2/$10 per Mtok, with its cache read halved to $0.10 on October 7), Claude Haiku 5.5 (released October 7 at $0.10/$0.50 per Mtok for prompts up to 100,000 tokens and $0.50/$2.50 above, 90% under the Haiku 4.5 it replaces), Claude Opus 5 (released July 24), Sonnet 5 and Haiku 4.5, with Claude Opus 4.1 retired on the Claude API on August 5; OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and the GPT-5.6 family (Sol, Terra and Luna, generally available July 9, with Terra and Luna repriced July 30 and Sol taking its own promotional cut on August 21, held through at least November 21); xAI's Grok 4.7 (released September 21 at an unchanged $2/$6 per Mtok) and Grok 4.6 (released August 12, 35 days after Grok 4.5); Meta's Muse Wonder (released October 12 as a Meta Model API preview at $4/$20 per Mtok, its first frontier-tier model) and Muse Wonder Full (released the same day inside Muse Code only, with no API price), Muse Spark 1.3 (released September 2, with max reasoning opened to all developers September 4), 1.2 and 1.1 plus Muse Glimmer (an Apache 2.0 open-weight model); Google's Gemini 4 Argon (released September 30 as a limited preview, first to cyber defenders in its Fairwind Program, at an introductory $2/$10 per Mtok that rises to $4/$20 on an undated expiry), Gemini 3.7 Flash (released August 13 at an introductory rate that doubles on January 1, 2027), 3.6 Flash, 3.1 Pro, 3.5 Flash and 3 Flash; Thinking Machines' Inkling (released July 15, a 975B/41B-active MoE under Apache 2.0); and the leading China-built models DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash (both moving to peak and off-peak billing on August 16), Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max, Qwen3.8-Max (released August 3, with open weights published August 13 under a custom licence rather than Apache 2.0) and the Qwen3.8-Max-0902 post-training snapshot (released September 2 at the same $2/$6 per Mtok), Moonshot's Kimi K3 (released July 16) and K2.7 Code, and Zhipu's GLM-5.2. Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 shipped June 9, 2026, was suspended June 12 under a US export-control directive, and returned in early July 2026 after the Commerce Department lifted the directive. Each row links to the provider's official page and is dated to when it was last verified.

What AI models are coming next?

One entry: Reflection AI's Beam, announced October 5, 2026, a 501-billion-parameter open-weight model (23 billion active) that is in early access by waitlist only, with no public API and no price. Reflection says its Apache 2.0 weights ship later in October. Google's last announced-but-unshipped entry before it, Gemini 4, shipped as Gemini 4 Argon on September 30, 2026, as a limited preview for cyber defenders in Google's Fairwind Program at an introductory $2 and $10 per million tokens. The list was empty for a week because the labs cleared their pipelines in September: Claude Fable 5.1 on the 1st, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8-Max-0902 on the 2nd, GPT-6 Astra on the 3rd, Grok 4.7 on the 21st, Claude Opus 5.5 on the 22nd, Claude Sonnet 5.5 on the 28th, GPT-6.1 Sol on the 29th and Gemini 4 Argon on the 30th. Google's Gemini models page lists nothing unreleased (checked October 1, 2026), and no announced-but-unshipped model was found at OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, DeepSeek, Alibaba, Moonshot or Zhipu on September 23, 2026; xAI's Grok 5 is widely reported but xAI's own site could not be read to confirm it, so it is not listed. A model appears here only once its lab announces it or credible reporting surfaces it, attributed to its source.

How much do new AI models cost to use?

Per-token API rates span two orders of magnitude, from GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5 (on prompts up to 100,000 tokens) at $0.10 per million input tokens to Claude Fable 5, Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra at $10. DeepSeek held the bottom of that range until 16:00 UTC on August 16, 2026, when it moved to peak and off-peak billing: V4 Flash input went from $0.14 flat to $0.22 off-peak and $0.44 at peak, so the rates shown here for both DeepSeek rows are the peak figures. But the sticker rate is not the bill: what a task actually costs is set by how many tokens an agent burns, and the cheapest per-token model is often not the cheapest to finish the work. GPT-6 Astra is the clearest case on this table. It costs 2.5 times GPT-5.6 Sol per token and matches Fable 5.1 exactly on the sticker, yet on the independent Terminal-Bench 4.0 board it finishes a task for $17.02 against the $32.69 Fable 5.1 costs, because it burns 1.53 billion tokens where Fable 5.1 burns 2.75 billion. Fable 5.1 makes the same point from the other direction: it matches Fable 5 on every headline rate and still costs about 21% less on a long agentic run, because the only number it changed was the cache read. Claude Opus 5.5, released September 22, is the rarer case where the sticker itself fell: $4/$20 against the $5/$25 Opus 5 charged, with the cache read down 60% to $0.20. Model any row in the cost-per-task calculator to see the real figure.

Where does this AI model data come from?

Every per-token rate is read off the provider's own official API pricing page, stored with that source URL, and stamped with the date it was checked. Release and announcement dates are recorded only when a primary source states them. Nothing here is taken from memory or an unsourced tracker.

Sources

Per-token rates for the released models are grounded to each provider's official API pricing page, verified October 2026:

Spotted a rate that has changed, or a model that is missing? Submit it or send a correction. Featured and enhanced listings are available.

For the cadence figures:

Latest analysis

← Back to Capital & Compute